5 techniques simples de thinking fast and slow en français
5 techniques simples de thinking fast and slow en français
Blog Article
Nous Premier finding is that people are loss-averse. We will take a bad deal in order to avoid risk, and yet will take a big risk in order to loss. This behavior seems to be motivated by année soutenu fear of lamentation, and it is the parti of a authentique amount of conservatism, not only in economics, ravissant in life.
“To him it was clear: Training was hopeless for all kinds of judgments. Fin we’ve tested Michigan students over four years, and they vue a huge increase in ability to solve problems. Graduate students in psychology also vision a huge gain.”
These insights help habitudes think more rationally and make better decisions, including in financial matters, where we might Lorsque prone to impulse, allowing our emotions get the better of us and really cost usages.
The anchoring measure would Quand 100% for people who slavishly adopt the anchor as an estimate, and zero connaissance people who are able to ignore the anchor altogether. The value of 55% that was observed in this example is typical. Similar values have been observed in numerous other problems.
Too bermuda and the book is unsatisfying—too longitudinal, and maybe it’s more so. And I think this flaw is entirely avoidable; it’s a result of Kahneman’s tendency to reiterate, to circle back around to the same discussions over and over again. He spends année entire chapter nous-mêmes Contiguïté theory, then a few chapters later he’s telling coutumes about its genesis all over again, just from a slightly different angle. Like that party guest, Kahneman is full
Though perhaps not as amazing as the blurbs would have you believe, I cannot help plaisant conclude that this is a thoroughly philanthrope book.
All I could think about when I read this book is my own experience of participating in a friend's psychology study léopard des neiges. He designed année experiment and asked me to do some things and answer some énigme, joli at some point it became extremely clear to me what the experiment was about, pépite how he hoped I would behave.
Nisbett’s deuxième-favorite example is that economists, who have absorbed the lessons of the sunk-cost fallacy, routinely walk démodé of bad movies and leave bad hôtel meals uneaten.
How courtrooms are inhospitable to female enduro lawyers, the nasty scientific feud over what killed the dinosaurs, and how your brain deceives you.
Kahneman's discoveries and renseignement of mandarin capacity and biases could form the basis of a "Intellectuel Martial Style" program: an option form of indoctrination, in which students are trained to understand their brains' weaknesses, and learn to take stances or engage in practices that eliminate pépite reduce the errors to which these weaknesses can lead.
Vos Éditorial vus récemment puis vos recommandations Selon vedette › Afficher ou bien convertir votre historique en même temps que navigation Après détenir consulté unique produit, regardez ici pour revenir simplement sur ces pages lequel vous-même intéressent. Recommencement Parmi dominant
Well, if you had never seen an episode of Monty Python and your entire experience of their work was pour the interpretation of men of a véritable age down the bar - then finally getting to see année episode of the naissant would be much the same effect as reading this book. Hundreds of people have already told all this guy's best stories in their own books - fin all the same it is a pleasure to hear them again by the guy that first said, 'this parrot is dead' or rather, 'framing effects make fools of coutumes all'.
This is an sérieux book. Humanity would Lorsque much improved if these insights could percolate through society and really take hold. thinking fast and slow résumé Joli they probably won’t. Because we’re assholes.
I recommend it. He explains the availability heuristic this way: “People are surprised that suicides outnumber homicides, and drownings outnumber deaths by fire. People always think crime is increasing” even if it’s not.